Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Behavioral Ecology a...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Article . 1991 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Allometry and the geometry of leaf-cutting in Atta cephalotes

Authors: James K. Wetterer;

Allometry and the geometry of leaf-cutting in Atta cephalotes

Abstract

This study considers the relationship of both leg length and the geometry of leaf-cutting to load-size determination by the highly polymorphic leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes. A. cephalotes workers anchor on the leaf edge by their hind legs and pivot around them while cutting arcs from leaves. I tested the hypothesis that, for an ant cutting a semicircular leaf fragment, fragment area is determined by a fixed “reach” while cutting. This “reach hypothesis” predicts that ants should cut the same fragment-area for at all leaf types. Also, if the radius of the semicircular fragment is proportional to hind leg length, this hypothesis predicts that leaf area should be proportional to hind-leg length squared. The field work was carried out in March–April 1990 and June 1991 in Heredia Province, Costa Rica. I measured hind-leg length for workers of different masses. I then measured leaf-fragment area and mass for workers cutting semicircular fragments from leaves of different densities (mass/area). The logarithmic relationship between ant mass (Ma) and hind-leg length L accelerated negatively (Fig. 1). As a result of this “complex” allometry, relative leg length (L/Ma0.33) increased with ant mass up to a mass of 7.4 mg. Above 7.4 mg, relative leg length decreased. For foragers cutting semicircular fragments, the area cut by an ant of a given size showed no significant difference among leaves of different densities (Fig. 2). Leaf area (A) increased as a function of leg length to the 1.9 power (Fig. 4), an exponent not significantly different from the square function expected if the radius of a fragment is determined by the ant's “reach”. As a result of this consistent mode of fragment-area determination, the mass of fragments cut by an ant of a given size was significantly greater when cutting denser leaves (Fig. 3) and relative area (A/Ma) cut decreased with increasing ant mass. However, because larger ants generally cut denser leaves (Table 1), the increased density of thick leaves was offset by the reduced relative area cut by the larger ants. Overall, 93% of the foragers cut fragments weighing between 1.5 and 6 times their own body mass (Table 1). Earlier studies found that this broad load-mass range maximized the biomass-transport rate (mass/distance/time) and transport efficiency (mass/distance/energy cost). Thus, A. cephalotes does not solve the problem of matching ant mass and load mass at leaves of different densities with flexibility in the leaf-cutting behavior of individual ants. Instead, individual ants employ a single simple behavioral rule, but workers of different sizes and body proportions tend to cut leaves of different densities.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!