Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Documenta Ophthalmol...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Documenta Ophthalmologica
Article . 1984 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Radial keratotomy: A comprehensive evaluation

Authors: A C, Neumann; R H, Osher; R E, Fenzl;

Radial keratotomy: A comprehensive evaluation

Abstract

A prospective clinical investigation of radial keratotomy employing the Fyodorov method and instrumentation was initiated in March, 1980. The results of the first 147 eyes undergoing this surgical procedure for the reduction or elimination of myopia were analyzed one year following surgery. The mean preoperative, uncorrected visual acuity was finger counting vision and the mean preoperative myopic spherical equivalent was 5.33 diopters. The preoperative myopic refractive error ranged from 1.75 to 11.75 diopters. Radial keratotomy resulted in a mean uncorrected visual acuity of 20/35 with a mean reduction on myopia of 4.66 diopters. Eighty percent of the 147 eyes experienced 20/40 or better uncorrected vision. Sixty-eight percent of high myopia eyes (6.00 to 11.75 D) attained this level of uncorrected vision with a mean reduction of myopia of 6.23 diopters. Glare and variation of vision were the most frequently reported complications. A non-progressive endothelial cell loss of 5.2 percent was observed. The degree of preexisting myopia, patient age, fellow eye experience and surgeon learning curve significantly influenced the surgical result and facilitated the predictability of the procedure. Incision depth was directly related to surgical result. The low myopia group achieved stabilization of effect by six months while stabilization occurred later in patients with high degrees of initial myopia. Patient satisfaction was high and 78 per cent of the patients elected to undergo radial keratotomy in their fellow eye.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Microsurgery, Adolescent, Age Factors, Visual Acuity, Middle Aged, Refraction, Ocular, Cornea, Postoperative Complications, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Myopia, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Intraocular Pressure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    72
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
72
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!