
doi: 10.1007/bf00155039
pmid: 1269356
Automation of perimetry is quite feasible in normal subjects (3.6 % failures). It is equally feasible in patients with visual field defects not over 60 years of age (0 % failures). Automated examination ends in failure in 30 % of the patients in the older age groups seen in our clinic. This means that automated perimetry is particularly suitable for purposes of screening, i.e. to distinguish between subjects with and without visual field defects. Automated perimetry also allows performance of an accurate assessment phase, but in 16 % of the cases the examination will have to be performed by a perimetrist. To a center for perimetry, this still means a considerable lightening the work load. In general, automation of perimetry means that the possibility of examination of the visual field is made available to large groups of people.
Adult, Automation, Age Factors, Humans, Visual Field Tests, Middle Aged, Visual Fields, Aged
Adult, Automation, Age Factors, Humans, Visual Field Tests, Middle Aged, Visual Fields, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
