
doi: 10.1007/bf00154878
pmid: 1752191
Experience with a number of visual fields has shown that the algorithm used earlier for estimating general depression in glaucomatous visual fields was too conservative. A new, more sophisticated algorithm for calculating diffuse loss has been devised and the results obtained in the evaluation of 20 glaucomatous visual fields were compared with those obtained manually. The new algorithm is less restrictive, yet produces values for diffuse loss which agree well with the empirical estimates (R = 0.97, N = 14). The new diffuse loss index is also compared with the mean defect index (R = 0.77, N = 159), the 18th Bebie curve ranked value (R = 0.87, N = 159), and the previous diffuse loss index (R = 0.98, N = 105). A general discussion of various aspects of diffuse loss is included.
Humans, Visual Field Tests, Glaucoma, Visual Fields, Algorithms, Software
Humans, Visual Field Tests, Glaucoma, Visual Fields, Algorithms, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
