
doi: 10.1007/bf00151811
pmid: 4706092
Electro-oculography is used as electrodiagnostic test in ophthalmology. The results show considerable variability. For this study a multivariate experiment was designed to help identifying independent variables contributing to the light peak to dark trough ratio and to test which response parameter carries the least variance. No sex difference was found for the peak to trough ratio. Trough and peak potentials are highly correlated. The standard error of the peak to trough ratio is 0.17 or about 10% of the peak to trough ratio. Up to 71 percent of the variance can be accounted for when one light and dark phase of 12.5 minutes each is used. The empirical model is less precise in its predictive value than a formal model, which accounts for more than 90 percent of the variance.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Retina, Electrooculography, Sex Factors, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Child, Photic Stimulation, Aged
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Retina, Electrooculography, Sex Factors, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Child, Photic Stimulation, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
