
doi: 10.1007/bf00134635
We discuss several possible legal principles from the standpoint of Bayesian decision theory. In particular, we show that a compelling legal principle implies compatibility with decisions based on maximizing the expected utility.
UTILITY, PROBABILITY, justicia e instituciones sólidas, 16 Peace and Justice Strong Institutions, DECISION THEORY, ACTIONS, 16 Paz, RATIONAL DECISION, PENALTY, LAW
UTILITY, PROBABILITY, justicia e instituciones sólidas, 16 Peace and Justice Strong Institutions, DECISION THEORY, ACTIONS, 16 Paz, RATIONAL DECISION, PENALTY, LAW
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
