Immobilization of ?-D-Glucosidase and ?-D-Glucosidase-polyphenolic complexes

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Sep 1983 Australia English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Biotechnology Letters, volume 5, pages 619-624 (issn: 0141-5492, eissn: 1573-6776,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Sarkar, J M; Burns, Richard G;

doi: 10.1007/bf00130844

Immobilization of ?-D-Glucosidase and ?-D-Glucosidase-polyphenolic complexes

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

β-D-Glucosidase, alone and after copolymerizing with a resorcinol polymer, was immobilized on a PM 10 ultrafiltration membrane, κ-carrageenan and DEAE (DE52) cellulose. The best support for both enzyme preparations, in terms of high Vmax values, was the ultrafiltration membrane. Compared with free β-D-glucosidase, both preparations immobilized on ultrafiltration membranes exhibited: different pH optima, enhanced thermostability, and were more suitable for continuous hydrolysis of substrate.

Country

Australia

Related Organizations

University of Kent
United Kingdom
University of the Sunshine Coast
Australia

Keywords

FoR 09 (Engineering), FoR 10 (Technology), FoR 06 (Biological Sciences), biotechnology

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	16
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average