
doi: 10.1007/bf00124347
pmid: 8035210
Utilization of coupling constants as restraints in computational structure refinement is reviewed. In addition, we address the effect of conformational averaging and examine different approaches to apply the restraints when the experimental observable is obviously a result of averaging. Here, two different computational methods are compared. The simulation of a single structure with time-dependent restraints produces results very similar to those obtained with the calculation of numerous copies of the molecule (an ensemble of structures) and ensemble averaging. The advantages and disadvantages of the two methods are illustrated with simulations of cyclosporin A, for which 117 NOEs and 62 homo- and heteronuclear coupling constants have been measured.
Models, Molecular, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Time Factors, 030505 Physical Organic Chemistry, Chemical Phenomena, Chemistry, Physical, Protein Conformation, 030402 Biomolecular Modelling and Design, Ensemble averages, Structure refinement, Coupling constant restraints, Time-dependent restraints, Structure-Activity Relationship, Cyclosporine, Computer Simulation, 030606 Structural Chemistry and Spectroscopy, Mathematics
Models, Molecular, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Time Factors, 030505 Physical Organic Chemistry, Chemical Phenomena, Chemistry, Physical, Protein Conformation, 030402 Biomolecular Modelling and Design, Ensemble averages, Structure refinement, Coupling constant restraints, Time-dependent restraints, Structure-Activity Relationship, Cyclosporine, Computer Simulation, 030606 Structural Chemistry and Spectroscopy, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
