Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Cancer Causes & Cont...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cancer Causes & Control
Article . 1991 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Reproductive factors and colorectal cancer

Authors: C. La Vecchia; S. Franceschi;

Reproductive factors and colorectal cancer

Abstract

Descriptive and analytical epidemiology have suggested that cancer of the colorectum may have reproductive correlates similar to those of breast cancer (e.g., protection by parity and early age at first birth), but the evidence is still controversial. We therefore reviewed published data from 15 case-control investigations, two cohort studies, and one cancer registry-based study from seven different countries. With reference to parity, statistically significant protection for colorectal cancer was found in three case-control studies; in four other studies, significant inverse relationships of parity were observed with colon cancer, but not with rectal cancer. Among the remaining 12 studies, relative risks below unity for parous or multiparous women were observed in four. There was no appreciable trend in risk in four others; in two, there was nonsignificant increased risk with parity; and in one, a significant increased risk. Information on age at first birth was available from 12 studies. Three reported significant trends of increased risk with increasing age at first birth--one found a direct association of borderline significance; six indicated no evidence of association; and two reported an inverse trend in risk of borderline significance. Findings on age at menarche were inconsistent and mostly negative, although an inverse significant association was reported, especially regarding colon cancer, in one investigation. In all the six studies, which provided information on age at menopause, there was a hint of protection, although nonsignificant, for women who underwent natural menopause at an older age. Two studies reported a direct association of colorectal cancer with use of oral contraceptives, and another showed an inverse relationship with the use of menopausal estrogens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Country
Italy
Keywords

Age Factors; Colorectal Neoplasms; Contraceptives, Oral; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Female; Humans; Risk Factors; Maternal Age; Menopause; Menstruation; Parity, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Age Factors, Menstruation, Parity, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Menopause, Colorectal Neoplasms, Contraceptives, Oral, Maternal Age

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    56
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
56
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!