Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Hydrobiologiaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Hydrobiologia
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Protoplasts of Gelidium robustum (Rhodophyta)

Authors: D. A. Coury; M. Polne-Fuller; A. Gibor; T. Naganuma;

Protoplasts of Gelidium robustum (Rhodophyta)

Abstract

Viable protoplasts were isolated from apices of the agarophyte Gelidium robustum (Gardn.) Hollenb. & Abb. using a combination of commercial cell-wall degrading enzymes and extracellular wall-degrading enzymes isolated from a marine bacterium. The protoplasts were approximately 8–15 µm in diameter, liberated mainly from the surface cell layers and from cells at the distal ends of medullary filaments. The bacterial enzyme alone was not sufficient to liberate significant numbers of protoplasts. Maximum yield was 9 × 105 protoplasts/g tissue (wet wt.). Optimum osmolality occurred between 1750–1950 mOs kg−1; yield and viability were severely diminished at osmolalities less than 1350 mOs kg−1. Viability, as determined by flurorescein diacetate staining and Evans Blue exclusion 1 hr after removal from the enzyme solution, was approximately 80–95%. Roughly 80% of the cells did not show Calcofluor fluorescence, while 40% stained positively for the presence of sulfated polysaccharides. Cell wall regeneration was observed with inconsistent reproducibility, and no cell division was observed when the protoplasts were placed in culture medium.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!