
doi: 10.1007/bf00022318
Rooted cuttings of the pot-grown Chrysanthemum variety “Hortensien Rose” were irradiated with X-rays, fast neutrons, thermal neutrons and electrons. As soon as the plants grew they were topped to stimulated side-shoot formation, often resulting in complete periclinal chimeras (sports). In addition mutation frequency in a given number of plants is enlarged by such a method. Electrons proved to be ineffective, producing only 6–10% mutated plants. The optimum dose X-rays is 1500 Rads. Both fast and thermal neutrons showed a marked higher mutation frequency, the best dose resulting in both cases in c. 28% of mutated plants. The mutation spectra, e.g. the type of mutations induced, showed some variation after the various treatments. But the number of plants irradiated, as well as the number of mutations induced, do not justify the conclusion that a certain treatment results in a specific mutation spectrum, although there was a tendency towards greater variability after neutron irradiation. The mutation spectrum as well as the frequency greatly depends on the genetic constitution of the treated material. Irradiation of the pink-flowering “Hortensien Rose”, with the maximum number of dominant genes for flower colour, resulted in a great number of different flower colours, as was expected, as well as a number of mutations of flower shape and size. Other pink-flowering varieties showed a similar spectrum, although in some cases the frequency was low or even zero. Chrysanthemum varieties with other flower colours showed a lower mutation rate, most of the flower colour mutations being based on a lower number of dominant genes. Finally, the practical importance and ways of application were discussed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
