
doi: 10.1007/bf00010466
Monogenea van Beneden, 1858 is the most appropriate name to apply to the class of Platyhelminthes comprising the monogenean flatworms. Monogenoidea sensu Bychowsky (1937) is considered an emendation of Monogenea van Beneden, 1858. Arguments that support the use of Monogenoidea as the valid name of the class are based on erroneous assumptions of authorship and of “priority” and “rank”, as defined in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, a document that does not apply to taxa above the family level. In the absence of defined rules, names for higher taxa should be based on a combination of priority, stability and consensus among specialists, with stability and consensus the most important considerations. The priority of Monogenoidea versus Monogenea is questionable, and both nomenclatural stability and consensus among specialists favour the use of Monogenea rather than Monogenoidea.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
