
It is common, at an elementary level, to define integration as the process that is the inverse of differentiation. Thus, given a function f, we look for a function F such that F′(x) = f(x) for all x. There is, in fact, no reason why such a function should exist. Next, if a and b are real numbers with a < b, it is shown that F(b)−F(a) gives the value of what is intuitively under-stood to be the area under the curve y = f(x) between x = a and x = b. This approach is unsatisfactory first because it gives no meaning to ‘integral’ for a function which is not a derivative, and second because it cannot cope with situations where the notion of area under the curve has no obvious intuitive meaning.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
