<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Harold N. Lee has contended that metaphysical doctrines, such as solipsism and mind-matter dualism, should be interpreted as hypotheses.1 This claim is of considerable importance, for if it is correct, we should reject not only the traditional dogma that some metaphysical doctrines are “absolutely certain,” but also the skeptical rejoinder which the dogma frequently has evoked, namely that they cannot be knowledge at all. Lee’s proposal is a mean between these two extremes, since it permits metaphysical doctrines to be probable knowledge. It has the advantages of each extreme, and the defects of neither.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |