Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1983 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1989 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Haemodialysis Monitors and Monitoring

Authors: Prakash R. Keshaviah; Stanley Shaldon;

Haemodialysis Monitors and Monitoring

Abstract

The world wide acceptance of haemodialysis as a long term means of achieving survival for patients with end stage renal failure may have obscured the inherent danger of this technique to the patient. It is a potentially lethal process where the total blood volume is recirculated extracorporeally 10 to 30 times in a period of 4 to 8 hours, 2 to 3 times per week for an indefinite number of years. The technique evolved rapidly from the intensive care unit with continuous nurse/doctor observation of the patient in 1960 (1), to the patient’s own home, where unattended overnight haemodialysis was first performed in 1964 with a passive flow system and without the use of a blood pump (2). The universal preference for the arteriovenous (A-V) fistula (3) and its implied use of a blood pump, together with the requirement that the patient accepts more responsibility for his own treatment (4), and the more recent development of short hour dialysis schedules with or without large surface area dialysers (5) have placed an even greater emphasis on the need for adequate equipment and monitoring.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?