
As we pointed out in Chapter II of the Introduction to Volume II, it is already plain from documentary evidence that the number of pupils working in Rembrandt’s studio must have been considerable. Attention was drawn to the status of these young artists as ‘leerjongens’ (apprentices) or ‘knechten’ (assistants), and their potential importance for the output of the workshop. Following on from the conclusions and suggestions put forward concerning works produced in Rembrandt’s studio by Isack Jouderville and Govaert Flinck in the early 1630s, the present chapter will deal with the workshop production of the years 1632–42 and, where directly connected, with the work of his pupils after they had set up on their own. Besides the various types of workshop piece, we shall consider the part played in this production by identifiable hands.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
