Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Pseudo Panel Data

Authors: Marno Verbeek;

Pseudo Panel Data

Abstract

In the previous chapters much attention was paid to estimation and testing strategies using panel data in a variety of models.1 In practical situations, however, a true panel data set may not always be available, while repeated cross sections are. For example, in the United Kingdom, no panel data are available on consumer expenditures or labour supply. Nevertheless, a random sample of the population is available each year in the Family Expenditure Surveys (F.E.S.). Recently, several authors have stressed the fact that panel data are not indispensible for the identification of many commonly estimated models and that the parameters of interest can often be identified (with or without some additional assumptions) from a single cross section or a series of cross sections (see, for example, Heckman and Robb [1985], Deaton [1985] and Moffitt [1991]). In this chapter we shall discuss the identification and estimation of panel data models from repeated cross sections. In particular, attention will be paid to linear models with fixed individual effects and tomodels containing lagged endogenous variables.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    55
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
55
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?