
Propensity-scores and propensity-score-matching can be used respectively for adjusting covariates in a multiple regression analysis and for stratification/matching of asymmetric observational clinical data, and have recently been emphasized by Dr. D’Agostino in an invited paper in Circulation as a promising additional tool for analyzing such data (D’Agostino 2007). It was first described by Rosenbaum and Rubin in 1985 (Rosenbaum and Rubin 1985), as a method for adjusting confounding variables, otherwise called covariates, alternative to the usual subclassification and regression methods. In the pas few years its application has been extended to so-called propensity-score-matching, a method able to transform asymmetric into symmetric data that can be further analyzed like randomized controlled trials. Due to the increase of costs for randomized trials, more and more clinical investigators turn to observational studies as a method of research. The current chapter was written to familiarize the readership of this book with these relatively novel methods.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
