
Classical data values are single points in p-dimensional space; symbolic data values are hypercubes (broadly defined) in p-dimensional space (and/or a cartesian product of p distributions). While some datasets, be they small or large in size, naturally consist of symbolic data, many symbolic datasets result from the aggregation of large or extremely large classical datasets into smaller more managably sized datasets, with the aggregation criteria typically grounded on basic scientific questions of interest. Unlike classical data, symbolic data have internal variation and structure which must be taken into account when analysing the dataset. In this paper, we review briefly types of symbolic data, how they might be analysed and how such analysis differs from a traditional classical analysis.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
