
The previous chapter identified various sources of misspecification. This chapter introduces alternative count data models that overcome the restrictiveness of the Poisson specification. Most of these models can be classified according to the particular problem they address as models for unobserved heterogeneity or as models for selectivity, where unobserved heterogeneity reflects a lack of observability of independent variables, whereas selectivity reflects limits in the observability of the dependent variable. Hybrid models exists as well. A third category of models addresses the issue of endogeneity.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
