Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Biocompatibility of Materials

Authors: Miqin Zhang;

Biocompatibility of Materials

Abstract

Advances in biomaterials have been tremendous in both surgical and medical technologies over the past 30 years. Man-made materials and devices have been developed to replace parts of living systems in the human body, providing the patient the benefits of increased longevity and improved quality of life (Wise etal., 1995; Silver, 1994). Specific applications of biomaterials range from high-volume products such as blood bags, syringes, and needles to more challenging implantable devices that are used in cardiovascular, orthopedic, and dental applications as well as in a wide range of invasive treatments and diagnostic systems. An estimated 11 million people at a rate increasing by 5–15% each year in the United States have medical implants (Eisenberger, 1996; Wise et al., 1995). With such a tremendous increase in medical applications, the demand for a wide range of biomaterials is ever increasing, and the prospects for growth in this field is limitless. The categories of materials that are widely used as biomaterials include polymers, metals, ceramics, carbons, and their composites. As medical procedures become more sophisticated, the application of novel materials, such as prostheses or materials used in medical devices, are receiving increasing interest. The emergence of microelectronic and micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) has stimulated a surge of interest in biomedical microdevices (BioMEMS).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!