Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Selections on Biotinylated Antigens

Authors: Patrick Chames; Hennie R. Hoogenboom; Paula Henderikx;

Selections on Biotinylated Antigens

Abstract

Phage antibody library selections on peptides or proteins are usually carried out using antigens directly coated on a plastic surface (e.g. Petri dishes, microtiter plate well, immunotubes, Chapter 9). This straightforward method is easy to perform and has been shown to be very successful for a diverse set of antigens (for review see Winter et al. 1994). However, phage-antibody selections on some proteins and especially on peptides are not always successful, often due to by immobilization-associated features. The main problem observed for selection on peptides is the very poor coating efficiency of some peptides and the altered availability of epitopes on plastic-coated peptides. The direct coating of proteins on plastic is usually more efficient but can also be problematic, because the passive adsorption on plastic at pH 9.6 is a mechanism of protein denaturation. Under these conditions, 95% of adsorbed proteins are non-functional (Butler et al. 1992; Davies et al. 1994). This problem is not very important for a classical ELISA because mostly a small fraction of proteins having a native conformation is still detectable. However, this phenomenon can be very troublesome for phage antibody library selections, because phage antibodies binding to epitopes only present in denatured molecules may be selected.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!