<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The core of biology is variation — of genes, phenotypes, species, ecosystems. This is a major difference from the so-called exact sciences. Carl Pantin (1968) has written of the latter, “physics and chemistry have been able to become exact and mature just because much of the wealth of natural phenomena is excluded from their study”. He goes on, “There is no need for the physicist as such to go to biology for data until in the last resort he has to take into account the fact that the observer is a living creature. I would call such sciences ‘restricted’. In contrast, biology and geology are ‘unrestricted’. Men of science devoted to these fields must be prepared to follow the analysis of their problems into every other kind of science. If they wish to advance their subject they cannot possibly say, “I will not burden my mind with chemistry, physics, or anything but my special interest”.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |