Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Neutralization by Fragments of Antibody

Authors: Nigel J. Dimmock;

Neutralization by Fragments of Antibody

Abstract

Experiments to determine whether or not the whole antibody molecule is necessary for neutralization were made possible by digestion with the proteolytic enzymes pepsin, which releases the Fc region leaving an F(ab)2 structure, or papain, which results in a monovalent antigen-binding fragment (Fab). Most data relate to IgG. Some work suggests that F(ab)2 is not as efficient at neutralizing as the whole IgG (poliovirus, Keller 1966; R17 phage, Klinman et al. 1967; visna virus, Jolly et al. 1989) or does not neutralize at all (adenovirus, Kjellen 1965a). However, F(ab)2 made from monoclonal IgG showed no reduction of neutralization (VEEV, Mathews et al. 1985; influenza virus HA, R.J. Rigg and N.J. Dimmock, unpublished data). Coversely, F(ab)2 to Semliki forest virus neutralized 100-fold more poorly than whole IgG (Boere et al. 1985). This is difficult to explain unless interaction of Fc regions with amino acid residues of the antigen which is a factor in precipitation by antibody (Steensgaard 1984) is important in neutralization of Semliki forest virus by this mab. Obviously F(ab)2 cannot carry out those activities which depend on signals integral to the Fc region such as binding to cellular Fc receptors or to complement, but F(ab)2 to RSV reduced lung virus titres in cotton rats by 100-fold (PRINCE et al. 1990).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!