
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Despite at least 20 years of evolution and with an ever-increasing number of systems, severity of illness quantification remains an imperfect and misused art. To many practicing clinicians the subject remains difficult and is often misinterpreted. Significant discrepancies exist between what these systems actually tell us and what we would like to know. Our aim in this chapter is to highlight these discrepancies and suggest, as have others, that new systems, developed in novel ways, are required if we want reliable answers to certain questions.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
