Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Authors: Elisabeth von der Lohe;

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Abstract

Each year 300,000 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations are performed in the United States, 25% of them in women. Over the past 30 years the patient population undergoing surgery has dramatically changed. In the early 1970s only a few patients (men and women) over the age of 70 years and/or with an ejection fraction less than 50% were felt to be suitable candidates for CABG. With refinements in technology and increasing operator experience the percentage of high-risk patients significantly rose (Weintraub et al. 1998). In other words, presently there is a much higher percentage of patients with reduced left ventricular function, three-vessel coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and over 70 years of age that undergo CABG than 25 years ago. Due to the increasing number of high-risk patients, operative mortality in men rose from 1% in 1974 to 2.7% in 1991 and in women from 1.3 to 5.4%, respectively. Since coronary artery disease in women generally presents approximately 10–15 years later in life than it does in men women undergoing CABG surgery are significantly older than men. The percentage of men older than 60 years increased from 28.8% in 1974–1979 to 59.6% in 1988–1991. The percentage of women over age 60 years was 45.1% from 1974–1979 and 77.3% from 1988–1991. Only 3.5% of men, but 7.3% of women, were older than 70 years from 1974 to 1979. From 1988 to 1991 it was 24.3 and 38.8%, respectively.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!