Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Luminosity Functions and the Mass Function

Authors: Francesca D’Antona;

Luminosity Functions and the Mass Function

Abstract

The determination of the Mass Function (MF) at the bottom of the Main Sequence is subject to severe uncertainties, due both to the very low intrinsic luminosity of these stars and to their rapidly varying Mass-Luminosity (ML) relation. A potentially very important field of exploration, although its present results are still to be correctly examined and understood, is the Luminosity Function in young star-forming regions, where very low mass stars and brown dwarfs are more luminous, and the derivative of the ML relation, forM ≲, 0. 1 M⊙, is reasonably large, especially for ages 0. 2–1 × 107yr. I also discuss the recent H ST observations of the Globular cluster NGc 6397. The HR diagram of the main sequence presents a “double kink” shape, which can be theoretically understood. While the first kink (at MI ~ 7. 5) is already a well known feature both of stellar models and in the observations, the second kink (at MI ~ 10. 5) was predicted by theoretical models (D’Antona, 1987), but it has been observed here for the first time. As the kinks, the change of slope in the ML, and the corresponding presence of features in the LF are related, I suggest that they may be used as a powerful way to check consistency between the distance modulus and assumed chemistry of the system under study, before one finally derives the MF. In fact, the MF index depends on the adopted distance modulus. I finally suggest that the flattening of the disk MF at ~ 0. 2 M ⊙ and its sharp increase at the MS bottom may be due to strong mass loss in M dwarfs of Pop. I, which alters a monotonically increasing IMF.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!