
In our previous work, we implemented WMN-GA system which is based on Genetic Algorithms (GAs) and used it for node placement problem in WMNs. In this paper, we compare the performance of Exponential and Weibull distributions of mesh clients for two WMN architectures considering PDR, throughput, delay, fairness index and energy metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3, Hybrid Wireless Mesh Protocol (HWMP) and TCP. The simulation results show that the PDR for both distributions is almost the same. The throughput of Exponential distribution is a little bit higher than Weibull distribution. The delay of Weibull distribution is lower than Exponential distribution. For Hybrid WMN, the fairness index of Exponential distribution is higher than Weibull distribution. But for I/B WMN, the fairness index of Weibull distribution is higher than Exponential distribution.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
