Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Planning Archaeology in World Cities: Looking at London

Authors: Hana Morel; Joseph Flatman; Kim Stabler;

Planning Archaeology in World Cities: Looking at London

Abstract

The UK’s long history in archaeology owes much of its origins, principles and pursuits to the practices of amateur archaeologists. It has come a long way since its Antiquarian eighteenth-century origins, with its foundations and values shaken by its gradual move towards the predominantly developer-funded profession that it is today. While the UK profession comes to grips with a series of planning policy statements and guidance published since the 1990s, local archaeologists continually renegotiate their roles and responsibilities with politicians, developers, the public and most notably themselves. London’s archaeology is overseen through a complex, and unique, mixture of local and central government controls due to the distinctive political structures of ‘Greater London’ with its overlapping borough, district and city responsibilities. Following national planning policy approaches developed since the 1990s by the government, the majority of actual physical fieldwork undertaken is contracted out through a competitive tendering process. Through a period of uncertainty during the Thatcherite era, the practice of archaeology in London reinvented itself alongside the ongoing survival and activities from communities, local societies and national organisations in the 1990s and 2000s, allowing for colourful—and sometimes contentious—outcomes that can work both for and against archaeology. Now, as neoliberal governance takes hold, dire cuts in government funding since 2010, together with a deregulatory agenda mean that environmental concerns like archaeology are increasingly sidelined. As a consequence, London’s archaeologists have to find more creative and innovative ways to protect and preserve the city’s heritage.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!