Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer Nature TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Placebo and Nocebo Effects

Authors: Dimos D. Mitsikostas; Christina I. Deligianni;

Placebo and Nocebo Effects

Abstract

Placebo refers to the positive expectation that a treatment will help patients, and nocebo refers to adverse events related to patient’s negative expectations that a medical treatment will likely harm instead of healing. Both conditions illustrate the power of human brain and are strongly related to treatment outcome and adherence. Placebos and nocebos display particular role in pain conditions, such as headache. There is evidence that placebo analgesia and hyperhedonia associated with pain relief are mediated by activation of shared emotion appraisal neurocircuitry, which regulates early sensory processing, depending on whether the expectation is reduced pain or increased pleasure. It has been suggested that dopaminergic, cyclooxygenase/prostaglandins and opioid brain pathways reward circuitries, and decision-making processes play a crucial role in the mechanisms that underlie nocebo. For migraine prophylaxis, the mean placebo effect for responders (those who report at least 50 % reduction in headache days after treatment) has been estimated at 23.5 ± 8 % (95 % CI 18.3–28.8 %) vs. 45.5 ± 15.5 % (95 % CI 37.4–53.6 %) in the active groups. Correspondently, a reduction in migraine attacks of 16.8 ± 12.7 % (95 % CI 10.9–22.6 %) was observed in the placebo groups and 41.8 ± 11.7 % (95 % CI 36.9–46.6 %) in the active groups. In preventive treatments for migraine, dropout ratio due to adverse events in placebo-treated patients has been estimated up to 5 %, showing that 1 out of 20 patients treated for migraine prophylaxis discontinues treatment due to nocebo. Placebos and nocebos therefore affect migraine treatment outcomes significantly.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!