
In order to determine suitable routing protocols for the SGCN, this chapter surveys various existing routing protocols designed for wireless mesh networks. The focus is given to protocols that could be used for the NAN which is the most important segment of the SGCN. Based on this survey, the main operating principles along with weaknesses and strengths of the two candidate routing protocols are presented. Specifically, the Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) and the Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) are chosen to represent the location-based and self-organizing coordinate routing protocols, respectively. Finally, since the robustness is one of the key requirements of the NAN, this chapter presents a proactive parent switching (PPS) scheme, as an extension for RPL, to handle network element failures.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
