
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>The chapter discusses the processes of human perception and experiencing, and of quality formation. In this context, definitions of relevant terms are re-visited and adapted to the presented, updated view, and different aspects of research into quality at large and into Quality of Experience are summarized. Using a conceptual model, the quality formation process is analyzed in view of different contexts and tasks, such as taking part in a quality test under controlled conditions, experiencing a video presentation or concert, or exploring a system or device when considering a purchase in a shop. We provide a short overview of different quality assessment methods, and outline related trends in QoE research.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 102 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
