
arXiv: 2507.13946
Abstract Propositional inquisitive logic is the limit of its n-bounded approximations. In the predicate setting, however, this does not hold anymore, as discovered by Ciardelli and Grilletti [11], who also found complete axiomatizations of n-bounded inquisitive logics $$\textsf{InqBQ}_{n}$$ InqBQ n , for every fixed n. We introduce cut-free labelled sequent calculi for these logics. We illustrate the intricacies of schematic validity in such systems by showing that the well-known Casari formula is atomically valid in (a weak sublogic of) predicate inquisitive logic $$\textsf{InqBQ}$$ InqBQ , fails to be schematically valid in it, and yet is schematically valid under the finite boundedness assumption. The derivations in our calculi, however, are guaranteed to be schematically valid whenever a single specific rule is not used.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Logic in Computer Science, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Logic in Computer Science, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
