Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Universiteit van Ams...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer Nature TDM
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Trends in Computational Science: Natural Language Processing and Network Analysis of 23 Years of ICCS Publications

Natural Language Processing and Network Analysis of 23 Years of ICCS Publications
Authors: Lijing Luo; Sergey V. Kovalchuk; Valeria V. Krzhizhanovskaya; Maciej Paszynski; Clélia de Mulatier; Jack J. Dongarra; Peter M. A. Sloot;

Trends in Computational Science: Natural Language Processing and Network Analysis of 23 Years of ICCS Publications

Abstract

We analyze 7826 publications from the International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS) between 2001 and 2023 using natural language processing and network analysis. We categorize computer science into 13 main disciplines and 102 sub-disciplines sourced from Wikipedia. After lemmatizing full texts of these papers, we calculate the similarity scores between the papers and each sub-discipline using vectors built with TF-IDF evaluation. Among the 13 main disciplines, machine learning & AI have become the most popular topics since 2019, surpassing parallel & distributed computing, which peaked in the early 2010 s. Modeling & simulation, and algorithms & data structure have always been popular disciplines in ICCS over the past 23 years. The most frequently researched sub-disciplines, on average, are algorithms, numerical analysis, and machine learning. Deep learning shows the most rapid growth, while parallel computing has declined over the past 23 years in ICCS publications. The network of sub-disciplines exhibits a scale-free distribution, indicating certain disciplines are more connected than others. We also present correlation analysis of sub-disciplines, both within the same main disciplines and between different main disciplines.

Country
Netherlands
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Related to Research communities