
Civil society around the world has called for data-driven companies to take their responsibility seriously and to work on becoming more fair, transparent, accountable and trustworthy, to name just a few of the goals that have been set. Data ethics has been put forward as a promising strategy to make this happen. However, data ethics is a fuzzy concept that can mean different things to different people. This chapter is therefore dedicated to explaining data ethics from different angles. It will first look into data ethics as an academic discipline and illustrate how some of these academic viewpoints trickle down in the debate on data science and AI. Next, it will focus on how data ethics has been put forward as a regulatory strategy by data- driven companies. It will look into the relation between law and ethics, because if in this entrepreneurial context data ethics is not properly embedded, it can be used as an escape from legal regulation. This chapter will end with a reflection on the future relation of data ethics and data science and provide some discussion questions to instigate further debate.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
