
Individuals in agrarian societies are attached to the land, so those who control the land control the people who work it. Control over land was gained through military power, which gave them political power. Their control over land also gave them economic power, so political and economic power were held by the same people. This produced a feudal system of governance, and coordination among individuals was accomplished more by control than by voluntary cooperation. Those who held power used it to maintain their positions in the hierarchy of power. Political motives dominated economic motives, so agrarian societies are characterized by stagnation rather than progress. Because it is difficult for people to exit an agrarian society, rulers have more authoritarian political control.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
