DAGS: Reloaded Revisiting Dyadic Key Encapsulation
DAGS: Reloaded Revisiting Dyadic Key Encapsulation
In this paper we revisit some of the main aspects of the DAGS Key Encapsulation Mechanism, one of the code-based candidates to NIST’s standardization call for the key exchange/encryption functionalities. In particular, we modify the algorithms for key generation, encapsulation and decapsulation to fit an alternative KEM framework, and we present a new set of parameters that use binary codes. We discuss advantages and disadvantages for each of the variants proposed.
- University of Washington United States
- UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO Brazil
- Institut d’Optique Graduate School France
- George Mason University United States
- Institut des sciences de l'ingénierie et des systèmes France
[INFO.INFO-CR]Computer Science [cs]/Cryptography and Security [cs.CR], 330, Post-quantum cryptography, Key exchange, Code-based cryptography; Key exchange; Post-quantum cryptography, Code-based cryptography, 004
[INFO.INFO-CR]Computer Science [cs]/Cryptography and Security [cs.CR], 330, Post-quantum cryptography, Key exchange, Code-based cryptography; Key exchange; Post-quantum cryptography, Code-based cryptography, 004
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).3 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!