Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978...
Other literature type
Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph
 View all 1 versions
Claim

Regional Orientation Index

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Other literature type 13 Dec 2018Publisher:Springer International Publishing
Authors: Soumyananda Dinda;

doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02475-8_7

Regional Orientation Index

Abstract

This chapter finds out regional orientation index for regional trade blocks within Asia and indicates regional bias for CFGT having a value greater than one. It shows that most of countries in the ASEAN and APTA were importing from countries within Asia. The APTA was better in terms of EEL export. The ASEAN as a group has regional bias towards its own region for all codes except SPVS in 2002 and 2008. The APTA as a group has regional bias for OC and CCT in 2008. The SAARC as a group has regional bias for EEL in both years and CCT in 2008. India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka prefer to trade in CFGT regionally. Asia is biased for OC in 2002 and 2008 and CCT in 2008.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!
uploadUpload now