Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Lupus Anticoagulant Testing

Authors: Karen, Moffat; Anne, Raby; Mark, Crowther;

Lupus Anticoagulant Testing

Abstract

Antiphospholipid antibodies are a heterogenous group of autoantibodies directed against glycoproteins in concert with anionic phospholipids. In clinical laboratory practice, antiphospholipid antibody evaluations usually consist of a combination of the following: anticardiolipin antibody assay, anti-beta 2 glycoprotein I assay, and at least two lupus anticoagulant assays with an appropriate confirmatory test. Lupus anticoagulants produce their laboratory effect by prolonging recalcification times in assays within which phospholipid content is limited. Although many assays are available, all are based on the fundamental principle of demonstrating normalization of prolonged recalcification times with the addition of exogenous phospholipid. The antibody specificity of an individual lupus anticoagulant is difficult or impossible to determine; however a small proportion do demonstrate avidity for selected proteins such as prothrombin or beta 2 glycoprotein I. The mechanism by which these antibodies cause their clinical manifestations remains unknown; however their relationship to increased risk of thrombosis, pregnancy loss, and autoimmune thrombocytopenia is undoubted. There is no correlation between the "strength" of lupus anticoagulants and the level of thrombotic risk; thus it is important to identify both "weak" and "strong" lupus anticoagulants.

Keywords

Antibody Specificity, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid, Antibody Affinity, Humans, Blood Coagulation Tests, Blood Coagulation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!