
pmid: 21516420
The angiogenic process is central in the pathogenesis of various diseases. The in vitro and in vivo monitoring of the neovascular process is essential for the development and evaluation of angiogenesis inhibitors or stimulators. Since no single method exists that can assess angiogenesis in a robust, reliable, and reproducible fashion, researchers often use a combination of assays to circumvent this problem. The experimental details of the most commonly in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo assays are presented here.
Male, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Infant, Newborn, Endothelial Cells, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Fibroblasts, Chorioallantoic Membrane, Coculture Techniques, Rats, Cornea, Drug Combinations, Mice, Animals, Humans, Biological Assay, Female, Proteoglycans, Collagen, Laminin, Aorta
Male, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Infant, Newborn, Endothelial Cells, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Fibroblasts, Chorioallantoic Membrane, Coculture Techniques, Rats, Cornea, Drug Combinations, Mice, Animals, Humans, Biological Assay, Female, Proteoglycans, Collagen, Laminin, Aorta
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
