
pmid: 21116793
Alphaviruses remain important emerging mosquito-borne, zoonotic pathogens that cause both localized human outbreaks and epizootics (e.g., Venezuelan equine encephalitis) and large human epidemics (e.g., Chikungunya). Alphaviruses are globally dispersed, and each continent has humans at risk from one or more of these arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses). Symptoms of human alphaviral disease range from frank, severe encephalitis (e.g., eastern and western equine encephalitis) to polyarthritis (e.g., Ross River). Diagnostic techniques to identify human alphaviral infections have changed dramatically with the development and implementation of standardized nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT). The NAAT is rapidly replacing virus isolation and typing using indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) assay with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) as the preferred method of virus identification. The older techniques still have value, however, since alphaviral growth in cell culture is rapid, and IFA with MAbs is inexpensive. This chapter provides detailed, standardized protocols for the identification of alphaviruses from clinical specimens and the serological characterization of human infection-immune sera. Both laboratory approaches are needed to identify and confirm human infections with these agents.
Alphavirus Infections, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Immune Sera, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Alphavirus, Culicidae, Animals, Humans, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect, Antigens, Viral, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
Alphavirus Infections, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Immune Sera, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Alphavirus, Culicidae, Animals, Humans, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect, Antigens, Viral, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
