
pmid: 30426446
In spite of taking precautions, some common mistakes creep into well-planned gel electrophoresis experiments. This occurs commonly in relation to calculating the cross-linking factor of a gel, polymerization temperature and time for a polyacrylamide gel, inducing aggregates in samples for electrophoresis, titrating the running buffer in electrophoresis, proper sample preparation, amount of protein to be loaded on a gel, sample buffer-to-protein ratios, incompletely removing phosphate-buffered saline from cells prior to cell lysis, and over-focusing of IPG strip in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. In addition, subtle artifacts can have significant deleterious effects on carefully planned and executed experiments. Proteases that act at room temperature upon proteins in the sample buffer prior to heating, cleavage of the Asp-Pro bond upon prolonged heating of proteins at high temperatures, contamination of sample or sample buffer with keratin, leaching of chemicals from disposable plastic ware, and contamination of urea with ammonium cyanate are some of the common reasons for artifacts in gel electrophoresis. Taking proper heed to all these factors can greatly help generate good experimental results.
Acrylic Resins, Temperature, Proteins, Buffers, Polymerization, Protein Aggregates, Cross-Linking Reagents, Proteolysis, Animals, Humans, Keratins, Urea, Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Artifacts, Gels, Algorithms, Cyanates, Peptide Hydrolases
Acrylic Resins, Temperature, Proteins, Buffers, Polymerization, Protein Aggregates, Cross-Linking Reagents, Proteolysis, Animals, Humans, Keratins, Urea, Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Artifacts, Gels, Algorithms, Cyanates, Peptide Hydrolases
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
