
We have seen that the step from arithmetic to algebra is merely the transference of the rules of numbers to letters, which, in a sense, makes algebra more abstract than arithmetic. But this difference is more apparent than real because numbers are abstractions also unless we associate them with measurable entities. Since a measurement is never precise, however, the number assigned to such a measurement is something of an abstraction and must be taken on faith. We accepted this abstraction when we introduced the ordinal aspect of numbers by assigning integers or fractions to points on a line because the points themselves are abstractions. Numbers become abstract even when we assign them to collections of discrete entities such as people or atoms. We can certainly speak of 5 people or the population of a town but things are not so clear when we are dealing with atomic entities. To say that we have one atom or one electron in a box is an abstraction since we can never isolate an atom or an electron with a certainty that permits us to speak of only one.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
