Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

General Inversion Theorems

Authors: Jay Jorgenson; Serge Lang;

General Inversion Theorems

Abstract

The Fourier inversion formula is a standard fact of elementary analysis. Harish-Chandra developed an inversion for K-bi-invariant functions on a semisimple Lie group G, in other words he developed the theory of a spherical transform [Har 58a], [Har 58b], which is an integral transform, with a kernel called the spherical kernel. There are variations to the setting of this transform, involving various factors. Harish-Chandra’s general Plancherel inversion in the non-K-bi-invariant case is a lot more complicated, and highly non-abelian. The K-bi-invariant case turns out to be abelian. However, in this case, one can look at the inversion on various function spaces, ranging over C c ∞ , C c , Schwartz space, L1, L2, ad lib. Harish-Chandra dealt fundamentally with the Schwartz space, which he defined in the context of semisimple Lie groups, and L2. Helgason pointed to the correspondence between C c ∞ and the Paley-Wiener space [Hel 66], complemented by Gangolli [Gan 71]. Then Rosenberg [Ros 77] gave a much simpler version of some parts of Harish inversion, using some lemmas from Helgason and Gangolli. Here we give this Rosenberg material, suitably axiomatized in a way which gives rise to a setting for pure inversion theorems in ordinary euclidean space, essentially along the lines of the similar elementary and standard theory of Fourier inversion. Roughly speaking, the situation is as follows.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!