
pmid: 8237609
Many studies in rodent models have demonstrated that Δ9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) can modulate the function of the immune system (1). Either injecting the drug into rodents or adding the drug to cultures of rodent T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, natural killer cells or macrophages (1,2,3,4,5) has been consistently reported to be associated with suppressing cellular functions. However, as compelling as these reports are, the question still remains whether these drug-induced immune alterations lead to a heightened state of susceptibility of the animals to bacterial infections. A few reports have attempted to address this question and have examined the influence of cannabi- noids on in vitro infection models and on resistance to challenge infections with various bacteria. Huber et al., (6) reported that the addition of marijuana smoke to pulmonary alveolar macrophage cultures resulted in the suppression of the bactericidal capacity for Staphylococcus albus and recently we reported (7) a similar finding in THC treated peritoneal macrophage cultures infected with Legionella pneumophila. Regarding drug effects on challenge infections, Bradley et al., (8) reported an enhanced susceptibility of mice to combination injections of THC and living or killed gram-negative bacteria and Morahan et al., (9) reported similar findings in a murine infection model with Listeria monocytogenes. In both of these studies, however, drug doses in excess of 100 mg/kg were found to be most effective therefore frustrating attempts to extrapolate these findings to the human drug abuse situation. Also, although these studies showed that drug treatment suppressed host resistance, little is known concerning the immune cellular and humoral defects involved.
Mice, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Animals, Female, Bacterial Infections, Disease Susceptibility, Dronabinol
Mice, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Animals, Female, Bacterial Infections, Disease Susceptibility, Dronabinol
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
