Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Striosome and Matrix Pathology in Huntington Disease

Authors: John C. Hedreen;

Striosome and Matrix Pathology in Huntington Disease

Abstract

This chapter is a review of knowledge to-date on striosome and matrix pathology in Huntington disease (HD). Inhomogeneous biochemical organization in the neostriatum was first identified by Pert et al (1975, 1976) and Atweh and Kuhar (1977), who described p-opiate receptor-rich patches in rat neostriatum. Striosomes in human neostriatum were first defined by Graybiel and Ragsdale (1978) as acetylcholinesterasepoor islands embedded within the acetylcholinesterase-rich matrix. It was later found that the two systems overlapped (Graybiel et al, 1981; Herkenham and Pert, 1981). Soon after, it was shown that the matrix and striosome compartmentation was demonstrable by immunocytochemistry using antibodies against the calcium-binding protein calbindin (Gerfen et al, 1985). The striosomal system has many other biochemical differences from the matrix (Holt et al, 1997). Striosomal connections differ from those of the matrix (Donoghue and Herkenham, 1986; Graybiel, 1990; Gerfen, 1992; Joel and Weiner, 2000). Striosomes receive cortical input primarily from limbic cortical areas and send axons primarily to the pars compacta of the substantia nigra, whereas the matrix receives most cortical input from non-limbic regions and sends its output axons to the two segments of the globus pallidus and the pars reticulata of the substantia nigra. About half of matrix neostriatal medium spiny neurons contain enkephalin in addition to GABA and send their axons primarily to the lateral pallidal segment, and the other half contain substance P in addition to GABA and send their axons to the internal pallidal segment and to the substantia nigra. atology.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!