
It seems that, over many centuries, no philosopher or mathematician ever seriously questioned Aristotle’s law of the excluded third: for every proposition p, either p or not p, symbolically p V ¬p. In retrospect, it appears that Aristotle himself had some doubts about applying this law when talking about events in time, e.g., when p was the proposition: there will be a sea battle tomorrow. But in mathematics, which deals with unchanging entities, the law of the excluded third was accepted as gospel truth, as was the equivalent assertion: for every proposition p, ¬¬p ⇒ p; two negations make an affirmation.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
