<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Berkeley, Lord Bishop of Cloyne, “active in many fields but remembered chiefly as a philosopher,” who, in 1744 started the European vogue of tar-water as a general medicine claimed to be successful in the treatment of over 150 different ailments, wrote to the London Magazine in 1747: “If I can but induce the general use of tar-water for this murrain, which is in truth a fever, I flatter myself this may pave the way for its general use in all fevers whatever.” He thought that although people might be loath to experiment on themselves, they would willingly attempt so inexpensive a remedy on their cattle (Berkeley, 1747). Many had turned to tar-water in 1746 when T. Prior of Dublin, an admirer of the Bishop’s method, quoted a source: Let the sick beast have poured down its throat a quart of warm Tar-water, made stronger than usual by stirring each gallon eight or ten minutes, and this to be repeated every hour or two for the first day, while the beast is awake. On the second, let one half of the former quantity be given; and on the third day, half of that which was given on the second: which last quantity is to be continued ‘till the cure is perfected; during which time, the beast should be housed and lie warm. He added, “I have no experience of the success of this method, as there is no infection of that kind in this kingdom,” having prefaced his remarks with the statement that the disease now prevailed in some parts of England. He also suggested that it might be advisable to daub the nostrils, ears, etc. of all the cattle, whether infected or not, to prevent catching or communicating the infection by air, “And also to make the beast swallow one egg-shell full, or two of crude Tar” (Prior, 1746).
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |