
Marxist literary criticism has a relatively long history but it is only comparatively recently that it has become widely accepted that Marxism should be seen as at the centre of critical discussion and debate. Earlier Marxist criticism — so-called ‘vulgar’ Marxism — tended to be viewed by those uncommitted to Marxist politics as reductive, since literary texts were interpreted in reflective terms as being directly determined by socio-economic forces, and though a critic such as Georg Lukacs was widely respected and could not be dismissed as a vulgar Marxist, his work was mainly influential within the Marxist tradition. Contemporary Marxism has questioned traditional dogma and has been prepared to enter into engagement with developments in modern theory. Thus what Jacques Derrida has termed a more ‘open Marxism’ has emerged.1
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
