
Development Economics (DE) rose to prominence as a separate sub-discipline in economics in the 1950s. Some would say that it had its heyday in the 1960s and early 1970s, and that from the mid 1970s it was on the wane. In certain senses, this is true. For instance, fewer First World students showed an interest in the Third World, and this affected the popularity of development courses. There has also been a blurring of the demarcation lines between development economics and other sub-disciplines of economics. Thirdly, DE initially achieved considerable lustre and excitement because people thought that it could slay the dragon of backwardness. By the 1970s, greater realism was setting in. As Sen (1983, p. 745) put it: ‘the would-be dragon slayer seems to have stumbled on his sword’. Yet this is all rather misleading. The important fact is that both the quantity and quality of research on less developed economies has continued to increase.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
